TOPIC: Enlargement failures and wins

Hey y'all. Ive been on this board reading and reading almost every thread. Finaly got an account to post a question. Ive been studying PE for years amd the pros and cons of each type. So i got 3 questions
1. Are their any reputable docs near Chicago that you jave heard of
2. Which do you in your own opinion believe to be the best procedure
And
3. Given the negative effects of penuma. Do you think its the product or the doctor administrating the procedure

1. I think I read one report of a guy getting something done in Chicago and it went horrible. If there was a reputable doctor in Chicago you would have read about it.

2. Most here get either PMMA or Ellanse. There isn’t an answer on which one is better. It depends if you want something that will absorb eventually or is permanent.

3. There’s no way you read that many threads.

Here is Doctor out the Chicago Suburbs (Skokie)
Gregory Turowski MD, Ph.D., FACS
Medical Director

drturowski.com/

I don’t know anything about him but he is doing FFT

1. If you're looking for one of the modern fillers, PMMA or Ellanse, I think Morganstern is the closest you're going to get. I believe they're in Atlanta. That's fine if you want Ellanse. If you want PMMA, I think you're going to have to go to Tijuana.
2. I think most people here would agree that PMMA and Ellanse are the best. They're long lasting or permanent, they're non-invasive, and the risk of major deformity is minimal.
3. I imagine it's both, but the point is moot because he's the only one doing it. Or at least that was the case when I last looked a year or so ago.

I saw that a Urologist in Chicago at Rush is offering the penuma. But for FFT. How long are those results. I know they require top ups but i havent seen anything with "concrete" timeline of how long it last

I'd stay clear of any iteration of silicone (implants, injections, etc) that's used for penis enlargement. I'd consider virtually ANY other option over silicone for PE. Just as a friendly PSA: PhalloBoards is a No-Silicone-Zone!

Skeptical_One wrote: I'd stay clear of any iteration of silicone (implants, injections, etc) that's used for penis enlargement. I'd consider virtually ANY other option over silicone for PE. Just as a friendly PSA: PhalloBoards is a No-Silicone-Zone!

That's a good summary of the situation. Elist is bad. Loria is bad. Avanti used to use silicone for some things, and they've discontinued that. Apparently they still use it for scrotal enhancement, but I'm not going to touch that with a seven Inch pole.

ToughPilllToSwallow wrote:

Skeptical_One wrote: I'd stay clear of any iteration of silicone (implants, injections, etc) that's used for penis enlargement. I'd consider virtually ANY other option over silicone for PE. Just as a friendly PSA: PhalloBoards is a No-Silicone-Zone!

That's a good summary of the situation. Elist is bad. Loria is bad. Avanti used to use silicone for some things, and they've discontinued that. Apparently they still use it for scrotal enhancement, but I'm not going to touch that with a seven Inch pole.

Pretty sure Avanti won't use silicone for even scrotal enlargement any more. They've just walked away from the stuff

Morgenstern doesn’t offer Ellanse

Hyperbol wrote: Morgenstern doesn’t offer Ellanse

I just looked into it, and I stand corrected.