TOPIC: Sylvester
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224434Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224457Sylvester wrote: I think I measured 5.5 after the first round, but as far as sex goes my girlfriend noticed more after the second round.
Thanks.
When did you have it done exactly and have you noticed any changes over time?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224514There is a small lump near the injection site after r2, and a little ridge near the base, where some material clumped, but they are not visible.
Also I seem to ejaculate quicker, but I think that is mainly due to extra sensation from a tighter fit in her pussy. Also I feel like my Balls and scrotum are shamefully small, but don't want to risk surgery with Dr E. At least I can finally satisfy my girlfriend.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224550Sylvester wrote: I had the first round in Sept 2013 and the second in Dec 2013. I had quite a bit of post sex inflammation to the point of irritation after each round but that subsided over time. The area right below the penis head also seemed to swell up more than the rest of my unit. But now it feels 99% normal. Just a little swelling after sex but only for a few minutes.
There is a small lump near the injection site after r2, and a little ridge near the base, where some material clumped, but they are not visible.
Also I seem to ejaculate quicker, but I think that is mainly due to extra sensation from a tighter fit in her pussy. Also I feel like my Balls and scrotum are shamefully small, but don't want to risk surgery with Dr E. At least I can finally satisfy my girlfriend.
Thanks.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224564Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224675Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285224687- Skeptical_One
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 4979
- Thanks: 613
jake17tx wrote: I'd never heard of this. There sure are a LOT of before and after photos on the website. No one else has ever reported on this? Check out the photos of the guy with the Dick tattoo in the gallery . . . o_0
Yes we've had two former patients, both of whom do not recommend this procedure or the Doctor.
Also, this site has had an unfortunate history with this and when I get back from Thanksgiving Dinner tonight, I'll gladly link any threads (you can also us Search function) showcasing what's transpired in the past.
Tread with caution!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285226719I noticed that if you drag those images (pic 1, 5, and 6) into google images, it has a few results on different websites. i don't know what that means, but i hope they are not fake pictures as i got my hopes up a little. , but still he could have posted them elsware?
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285226747- Skeptical_One
-
- Offline
- General
-
- Posts: 4979
- Thanks: 613
tom kat wrote: Edit.
I noticed that if you drag those images into google images, it has a few results on different websites. i don't know what that means, but i hope they are not fake pictures as i got my hopes up a little. , but still he could have posted them elsware?
Shills started out unrefined, unsophisticated, and obvious. As time has gone on, they've learned to adapt, know the "right things to say," and manipulate the unacquainted reader. The grounds you dismiss someone as a shill might come back to surprise you. Stay tuned and keep your popcorn nearby.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285226780Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285226887Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285228084michael wrote: I have seen a lot of silicone cocks, that it the most convincing....
That's because it's not got silicone in it. As TomKat has pointed out the photos are available elsewhere. However, the photos date back over 2 years. The reason I specifically asked Sylvester when he had the procedure done is because we'd already found the photo's, I just needed him to incriminate himself. We were going to wait and ask some more questions, but we didn't realize that other members, like TomKat would be on to him as well and inadvertently let the cat out of the bag.
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285228214As soon as Sylvester started posting we were suspicious of him, simply because he was a Loria "patient" and took the same style of "not recommending" Loira etc, that previous shills have done. But eventually we also knew he'd try and encourage guys to go to Loria.
As soon as he posted those photos it was obvious he was a shill as anyone with any experience of PE, could tell that there is no chance that that penis had been increased by 2" in girth. In fact it's doubtful it's been increased at all and even if all the photos are of the same penis. We then searched and found them on gay websites.
I asked Sylvester if the first photo was a before. He replied saying the first and 3rd we after round 1. That was his first mistake, as I'd already found a photo of the first penis, only it was a measured shot, showing a girth just over 6". This made no sense, as he claimed to be just over 6" after 2 rounds. So I got him to confirm that he was apparently 5.5" after round 1.
Here is a link to the photo I'm talking about:
gonewildaccount69.tumblr.com/ (scroll down and you'll come to the measure photos)
As you can see, it's taken on the same day as the measured shot he posted in this thread, claiming it was after round 1.
I then got him to confirm the dates and he said he had the procedures in Sept 2013 and Dec 2013. However, here are the flaccid photos, posted on a blog in April 2013.
imgur.com/a/APba1
So Sylvester is either a shill or a time traveler!
Here is another photo, from the underside, clearly every bit as thick as it it now, only this photo was dated 2 years ago!
imgur.com/A4CgngE
These are from July 2013
imgur.com/1SC4LHt
imgur.com/y4d6OyN
So there you go, conclusive proof as to why Sylvesters photos never made any sense. I'm sure SO will comment today or tomorrow.
But seriously guys this shouldn't have been necessary. You should all know by now that if it looks too good to be true, in this industry it isn't. As soon as Lorias name was mentioned, you should all have instantly dismissed it. But more importantly than that, the fact it looked good should have had no influence on you. It's the long term health concerns that are important. We still don't know for sure what Loria is injecting, so who cares if it looks good! Besides, the only genuine photo we've seen of a Loria patient ended up looking like an absolute horror show. Don't be fooled again!
Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.
Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285229180Re: Sylvester
11 years 8 months ago #1285230029Please Log in or Create an account to join the conversation.