TOPIC: Dr. Rian maercks experiances?

Jeph123 account wasn't just odd, it was straight up suspect. All his posts featured the name Dr. Rian Maercks prominently in the headline, in a promotional style.

Wildcat do you have before/after pic?

jackets5 wrote: I am a doctor in North Carolina and can tell you there are plenty shitty doctors who trained at Duke. However, they all have one thing in common. They all think they are the second coming of Jesus Christ

First, see my before after photos below and you can judge for youself his results.

Dr. Maerks is a nice, modest, transparent guy. Again, I am his patient not his office assistant.

Dr. Maercks never mentioned to me he went to Duke and the guy is not boastful. I noticed it upon researching him and am simply aware it's a very good school for training so at least for me, it was somewhat helpfu in my own decision making process.

Dr.Rian wrote: Hi Hoddle10, aleksk and PhalloBoards,

I am Dr. Maercks, the doctor this thread refers to. I have been made aware of these threads by several patients and can confirm for you that Jeph123 is indeed a real and very satisfied patient that I had recently had email communication from and is interested in helping others learn of my services. I would like to correct a point in Jeph123's post and that is that the term "dermal fat graft" does not apply to what I do. My procedure involves micro fat grafting ie lipoaspirate that is carefully harvested through a canula with very small holes and minimal processing. A dermal fat graft refers to taking a solid piece of dermis (the deep layer of the skin) along with subcutaneous fat in an en bloc manner. this has been done by many docs in the past with nearly universal disasterous results. It is perhaps a bit better than an alloderm procedure but never looks great and can frequently lead to fat Necrosis, calcification and unfavorable scarring. About twenty years ago a plastic surgeon named Bill Little popularized dermal fat grafting with facelifts but horrific results and complications made him abandone this in the face as well. Fat grafting is an incredibly powerful tool but must be performed carefully to avoid complications and deliver long term results. I have had the pleasure of 3+ year follow up with many of my patients and they remain satisfied with their enduring results. I recently performed a secondary fat grafting on a patient from two years ago because he was interested in more size but was very satisfied with his gains only wanting more. It is my philosophy to keep things conservative with Phalloplasty as most techniques can have horrific consequences. I am very much against PMMA and all product implantation including alloderm etc. I do perform minimally invasive ligament transection, but rarely because I think the results are so good without it. I comment more on this in a post that I just wrote in the lengthening section. I will respond to the posts that mention my name and am happy to be a resource in general to the members of this board. I will certainly answer all questions directed at me. Please be assured that I hold ethics as a crucial part of my practices and that there is nothing false or coming directly from my practice in Jeph123's post.

All the best,

Rian A. Maercks M.D.

I'm not sure many reading this thread will have much faith in that claim.

By pure coincidence you registered at exactly the same time as Jeph123. By an even more amazing coincidence you have the exact same IP address as lgrse.

This seems like the work of an unethical idiot.

Obviously there is no way you could have been involved as you hold ethics as a crucial part of your practice and you are "obviously smart" having gone to Duke University!

Double ya, double ya, double ya, shill dot com. Shill a mania. Shill a rama. Shillin at the beach with Jeph123 and Dr. Maercks.

The site www.miamiphalloplasty.com/gallery.html has some really nice before and afters but the main site themaercksinstitute.com/successful-penis...gement-phalloplasty/ doesn't. The office says they don't want to offend nonphalloplsty patients on the main site but may be adding a phalloplasty gallery in the future, Anyone on this thread had actual surgical experience with Dr. Maercks?

There is a thread on him on this board - do a search - and in the meantime, stay away from him. If I recall there are no after pics on his site and I have read some really bad reviews on him.

Lg wrote: I had a bad experience with dr maercks as well. If you did too, please let me know

I must agree, please post your experience with Dr. Rian Maercks. These facts are very suspect.... Jeph, you seem like a nice believable guy, but the mere fact that Dr. Rian Maersck logged in at the same time on the same date is too coincidental for me. It would have been much better if he would not have been banned so soon... You should have allowed him to prosecute/defend his work on this forum.... which is why this forum is needed and helpful.

Jeph, glad your happy with the results b/c that's most important, however, you have some symmetry issues on the left side.... Can that be fixed with a follow up procedure? The head hasn't been enlarged, what can be done, if anything? It's not perfect, but in my mind....any one even considering this type of procedures should anticipate some slight symmetry issues... your transferring fat... Question: Are you having any pain? Any calcification or Is it lumpy, post op?

Oslo wrote: Theirs 2 other members (wildcat44 and sugarmill2000) here that mentioned they had experience with Dr. rain. Their wasn't anything major that was negative,

I'm pretty sure they are the same person.

I saw that too, from July f. From the post I don't want to believe her since if you see her Yelp account it shows she only made one review only. That was a negative of him 2 times in a row one on 12/28/13 and the other 11/3/14. Something is fishy about that since that's almost a year apart, if someone did that bad of a surgery why would you go back again?

I try to see if reviews are real if someone just created account to give one positive review, or all positive or all negative since then they would be considered somewhat fake reviews . With realself at least a good amount of people show before/after pic of their operations, unfortunately not the penis enlargment but other surgeries

Some other sites like doctorbase verify who is reviewing

Only if we had someone who had personal experience with this doc to be able tell if positive or negative and if negative what was the issue?

Oh and in accordance with forum rules you are banned:

R12.)Account deceit is forbidden. (a) Multiple member accounts are not permitted. If you have mistakenly created multiple accounts, delete all but your primary account, or inform an Administrator to have this done for you. (b) The use of Proxy servers, or any other means to disguise one's authentic IP address is forbidden. (c) One registration per IP address. (d) Disposable or masked email accounts are forbidden. (e) Network Sharing Devices are forbidden.

(R7.)Falsifying information about a surgical method's technique, effectiveness, side effects, outcomes, results, success rate, and/or complication rate is wrong and unacceptable. Fictional testimony/reporting (also known as "shilling") of one's experience with phalloplasty is also forbidden.

phalloboards.websitetoolbox.com/post/com...54271?pid=1269042535

Jeph123 wrote: Third, since the KEY to Phalloplasty is to give you the most perfect penis possible.....symmetry of the way your penis looks is critical so -- that being said --- look at Dr. Maercks Chroniofacial experience which proved to me that if he can reconstruct someone's face, he can make my penis not only be big, but symmetrically beautiful. I already told Dr. Maercks I would be a telephone reference for him and have no problem sending before after photos. Dr. Maercks changed my life and the change is PERANENT since a stem cell dermal fat transfer of your own fat means the change is lasting. Wherever you're located in the US, go to this doctor...you'll get the result your looking for. -Jeff

Also Jeff, your penis clearly isn't symmetrical. They are very clear contour irregularities even in a 2D photo. If you are happy with it great. I see loads of results on here I don't think look very good, but the member who had it done is happy and that's the main thing. But in your case it does raise a contradiction as you suggested he was a perfectionist and that the fat transfer was permanent. If it's permanent then why are there are uneven areas? Either part of the transfer has already absorbed or Dr Maerks idea of perfection is pretty untypical.

I checked his site and realself and his method looked interesting in regards how he helps enlarge penis length and Girth without cutting ligament.

I was wondering if anyone had any experience from him?

I emailed him questions which he answered really fast and was nice enough to answer. I might think of making an appointment once I get the money to afford operation. Ofcourse before flying to Miami to do skype chat with him to see the before and after which I'm leaning towards him for operation, worst case scenario would be getting prp shot from dr. Mirza

Below is the email I got from him answering my questions

---

Thank you for contacting my practice. I will answer your questions inline below. If you can provide your best contact number I can have my coordinator call you tomorrow to set up a time for us to have an over the phone or in person consultation to answer all of your questions. It is important to realize that all kinds of practitioners are marketing fat grafting techniques and other procedures but few are doing them safely and efficaciously.

1. Is the surgery permanent and what is required after operation? As in is their any stretching involved, when to resume physical activity,etc...?

The results are lasting. Grafted fat will remain in place for life however as the rest of your body ages it will also. There is no special postoperative care other than avoiding pressure on the area and avoiding vigorous friction for ideally six weeks however most patients resume sexual activity in two to three weeks


2. What's the maximum increase in length can be achieved?

This is dependent on features of the individual patient's anatomy. The Flaccid length and Girth can double and sometimes even more and of course sometimes less.

3. I tried to do further research on the fat transfer, and while most mentioned just Girth only and not length, some of the articles mentioned the fat gets absorbed meaning loss of the fat. Is this true? And how is the length part achievable thru this process? Also is the glans slightly increase?

Fat transfer is rarely performed on a manner that avoids complications and delivers
Lasting results thus it has developed a bad name. I achieve consistent results and avoid complications by using a meticulous and somewhat unique technique. There is not significant absorption over time in my practice. There is a reduction in size from the immediate postoperative swollen result to two weeks after when the swelling is resolved but immediately postoperative the result is way too huge to be acceptable to most. Some of the fat is placed in the vicinity of the ligament and pushes the penis away from the body.
The fat in the shaft also further stents it out. I increase the size of the glans using "micro fat". A delicately harvested cellular slurry as thicker fat cannot be injected into the glans.


4. Is Erection size also increased? And is the quality feel natural? Since some fat transfer reviews mention mushy type feeling.

Most of my patients are beyond satisfied and I have never had a complaint about the penis feeling unnatural.

5. Would it be possible to get before and after pictures to see increase in length and Girth?
We can show you before and after pics in the office or possibly over Skype but cannot send them.

I look forward to speaking with you and delivering to you wonderful results.


All the best,

Rian A. Maercks M.D

Jeph123 wrote: Since you guys are absolutely wrong about your theory, here is my before and after photos:

Here is my before: drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx-U9Qvu1Bvtdjk...YVk/view?usp=sharing

Here is my after: drive.google.com/file/d/0Bx-U9Qvu1BvtclF...Ulk/view?usp=sharing

Yes, I did repeat the other posts because I don't have time to spend scanning this website. I was doing the guy favor since he asked and I said sure since I appreciated what he did for me.

Jeff

There is no chance that we are wrong. The proof is 100% there that Dr Maercks absolutely shilled the site. This isn't up for debate it's a fact. As I said, he was caught red handed. Both he and another poster making "inquiries" about his procedure, posted from the same computer! What more evidence do you want than that?

You've now just admitted to doing him a "favor since he asked." Read your own posts, do they sound honest or objective? When a Dr asks a patient to report about a procedure on a forum and the patient then makes wild claims such as yours, whilst initially not acknowledging doing at the request of the Dr, it's known as "shilling" and is against the forum rules.

I'm not reaching for conclusion that this guy might be "perfect" , even thou it would be nice . If few people had experience in regards to penis enlargement that was negative and was consistent then ofcourse I would want to stay away from him, but if you basing on a Yelp review from a reviewer that doesn't even seem consistent then it's not a valid argument to say stay away from him or that he is good. If you basing on reviews from different medical sites and even this type of forum then yes then it would be good argument to say if he is bad or good instead of jumping to conclusions.

Dr. Elist even thou promoted on gq and other media sites still has bad reviews from both here and other medical review sites hence a valid argument to say he is bad Doctor with only very few positive result but not worth taking the risk if u be the lucky one to get the positive results. I was interested in him but after further research, not the best results and peoples reviews were horror stories that scared me .

I'm on the fence of just doing erectus/prp shot only from eternamd or dr Mirza which I know not fully permanent but possible slight permanent results is better than nothing I guess, ofcourse this doc Rian maersk method seemed intriguing , and less scary than a ligament cut where you have to stretch and possible risk of losing few in if not doing stretch properly

The method is somewhat similar to dr Giunta FFT except the non cutting of ligament, which the reason for curiosity

Smalljay: yes I agree with you on that, since I sent second email after he responded to those questions about if the Erect size increases which he said yes increase in Erect as well

But didn't tell how much the Erect size increas