TOPIC: Dr. C

Restoration wrote: That was my initial approach, SpankAss - but so many reports of limited growth in R2 made me request 30% in R2 (10% in R1). I barely even got growth from R2. I don't even think there are many reports of people getting 10% in R2 and having noticeable growth.

Ya well after reading all the reports and especially yours it made me take a step back as to being pushy to what I wanted mentally rather than what my body might need. Hats off you to you sir for sharing your journey and making me see the light at least.

I have decided I dont care if it takes 5 years ... the slow way is the better way from all the reports I read and the Dr knows better than me.

I am glad to hear there is still another Dr who has experience offering PMMA. Out of curiosity is there a forum similar to PhalloBoards focused on Europe where guys have commented about Dr N or did you find out about her here ? Good luck !

I believe he is referring to the beads themselves actually breaking down. Plastic is not completely inert like glass. Eventually it decomposes, but slowly. Is the doctors statement online ? This would be very helpful to the forum. There are very few if any members that have had 30% for 5 yrs.

Thanks[/QUOTE]

You need to read more progress reports. I don't want to knock Dr. C, but the results are inconsistent at best. Even with the same person having multiple rounds. It's a crapshoot. Maybe you'll gain a half-Inch, maybe an Inch, or maybe you'll gain nothing. Maybe it will look normal, maybe it will look uneven, maybe you'll have a big circ ring, maybe you'll have nodules and lumps, or maybe you'll have several problems at once.

I can tell you this, there are very few people that have had this procedure, and it looks completely normal. I can also tell you that if you're gay, the chances are the men you're with will notice. If you're straight, some women might notice, and you'll have to think of an excuse to tell them, so they don't suspect it's a STD.

This is your Dick. This is the only Dick you have. Read all the negative reports, and then tell me that this is some miracle, or a marketing site for the Dr. C. Tell me if you'll be okay with the chance that your Dick will never again look and feel "normal", or at worst that you might have to have additional procedures (surgery) to remove hard lumps, nodules, or even deglove your Dick to remove all of it?

Maybe ask why this procedure isn't more common? I mean, if it's some "miracle" than why doesn't every plastic surgeon offer it? Why are you traveling to Tijuana Mexico to do it? Would you elect to go to Tijuana to have a "plastic surgeon" give you a nose job or a face lift, yet you don't even think twice about having them touch your Dick?

Also, why is it that in the past year it seems as if there's a definite trend of the results going down, and the number of problems going up? I'm not trying to tell you not to do it. It's up to you, but you should at least ask yourself these questions, and do some more research. [/QUOTE]

You had the procedure done SLK20003
How did it go?